Do science books say anything about carbon14 dating or not

Pointing to the front end of the mass spectrometer, Hodgins explains the principle behind it.A tiny sample of carbon extracted from the manuscript is introduced into the "ion source" of the mass spectrometer.An alien language But a second, closer look reveals that nothing here is what it seems.Alien characters, some resembling Latin letters, others unlike anything used in any known language, are arranged into what appear to be words and sentences, except they don't resemble anything written – or read – by human beings.

do science books say anything about carbon14 dating or not-78do science books say anything about carbon14 dating or not-50

"The Book That Can't be Read" airs on National Geographic Channel at 2 p.m. Christine Mc Carthy at Yale University’s Rare Books Library watches as Greg Hodgins dissects a sample of parchment for radiocarbon dating of the mysterious Voynich manuscript."Plus, if the book was re-bound at any point, the sampling spots on these pages may actually not have been on the edge but on the spine, meaning they may have had adhesives on them." "The modern methods we use to date the material are so sensitive that traces of modern contamination would be enough to throw things off." Next, the sample was combusted, stripping the material of any unwanted compounds and leaving behind only its carbon content as a small dusting of graphite at the bottom of the vial."In radiocarbon dating, there is this whole system of many people working at it," he said. From start to finish, there is archaeological expertise; there is biochemical and chemical expertise; we need physicists, engineers and statisticians.Fast-forward to 2009: In the basement underneath the UA's Physics and Atmospheric Sciences building, Hodgins and a crew of scientists, engineers and technicians stare at a computer monitor displaying graphs and lines.The humming sound of machinery fills the room and provides a backdrop drone for the rhythmic hissing of vacuum pumps.

Leave a Reply